TP-Docs
HTML5 Icon HTML5 Icon HTML5 Icon
TP on Social Media

Recent

Welcome to TinyPortal. Please login or sign up.

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 196,004
  • Total Topics: 21,330
  • Online today: 103
  • Online ever: 8,223 (February 19, 2025, 04:35:35 AM)
Users Online
  • Users: 0
  • Guests: 242
  • Total: 242

forum load time

Started by superQ, March 03, 2006, 03:50:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

superQ

Things have changed at the and I tested the load times and got this. :'(

Connection Rate Download Time
14.4K 103.82 seconds
28.8K 52.01 seconds
33.6K 44.61 seconds
56K 26.85 seconds
ISDN 128K 8.36 seconds
T1 1.44Mbps 0.91 seconds

The one I have is faster than the fastest one in the list.3 secs for frontpage to load. I wonder if it is possible to have a tpforum with any kind of reasonable dial-up load time and still have it functional for what it is a website around a forum.It need to look halfway decent too don't it

I have already optimized the banner at the top and that cut the load time considerably. I think about in half.The clock needs to go and I need to replace the banner,with something else :tickedoff:

Question is,do people around here worry about load times. Seems you do not have to add much to hit 10 secs[too long?] on dial-up

You can check your own site here.

http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/ :-\


NEW LOAD TIMES

Connection Rate Download Time
14.4K 73.85 seconds
28.8K 37.02 seconds
33.6K 31.76 seconds
56K 19.14 seconds
ISDN 128K 6.00 seconds
T1 1.44Mbps 0.70 seconds


G6Cad

Pretty fun testing the site like that. thanks for the link.

This is what i got with all things set to go on my site.

Connection Rate   Download Time
14.4K    96.33 seconds
28.8K    48.27 seconds
33.6K    41.40 seconds
56K    24.92 seconds
ISDN 128K    7.77 seconds
T1 1.44Mbps    0.86 seconds

gerrymo

Mine is pretty much the same as g6cad's. However, I am sceptical about sites offering testing sevices that are also selling the stuff so supposedly fix the problem. Quite often the results are weighted in their favour, or are written to look like their product will fix everything.

crip

I get this:

  • Connection Rate   Download Time
  • 14.4K    62.24 seconds
  • 28.8K    31.22 seconds
  • 33.6K    26.79 seconds
  • 56K    16.15 seconds
  • ISDN 128K    5.09 seconds
  • T1 1.44Mbps    0.62 seconds

    Love my T1.. ;D

superQ

I was wondering that myself. Maybe some people on dial up can verify.

That clock calendar is a biggy. It's gotta go :'(

You can optimize images free here

http://www.netmechanic.com/GIFBot/optimize-graphic.htm

Mine at the top don't look much different and it used to be 120K now 50

superQ

"crip"

I can't imagine dial up. How could superQ get all the help he needs. There only so many hours in the day :2funny:



gerrymo

Quote from: ÂÃ,»cripÂÃ,« on March 03, 2006, 04:18:06 PM
Love my T1.. ;D

Not sure if this is the equivilant of UK Broadband or not. But I get 2.3M-2.5M and wouldnt be without it. Had 56K AOhelL before that, and never saw more than 28K. AOhelL cost more each month as well!!!

bloc

As everythng else, the less files and images, the faster things will perform. SMF native should be easy to watch on dialup. TP is just a tad worse, mostly because of use of extra images.

"the cure" is also easy enough: turn off images, use simple themes(less tables and "extra" html code) and in TP: avoid extra images and heavy code snippets.


TwinsX2Dad

#8
Connection Rate   Download Time
14.4K    52.91 seconds
28.8K    26.54 seconds
33.6K    22.77 seconds
56K    13.73 seconds
ISDN 128K    4.33 seconds
T1 1.44Mbps    0.53 seconds

T1 is slooooooow, Crip. Try fibre optics instead.

But your connection speed has zero effect on these results. It is measuring the speed with which your server renders the file(s) to the network, in this case, the WWW. Your content is a big part of it, but so is your host. Many hosts still rely on T1 or T3 connections, because they are cheap. But as the T1 rating above shows (1.44Mbps), it is a far cry from my 20-25Mbps fibre connection. It is way short of a good dedicated server's connection speeds.

Anyone running an accelerator to help out?

SuperQ, I went to your site (The Rockpile) using a USR 56K modem. It is painfully slow, but most folks on modems are used to that by now. Part of your speed might be lost in that logo, but for the size, you have it cut well down.

Skhilled

I've got:

Connection Rate Download Time
14.4K               49.19 seconds
28.8K               24.69 seconds
33.6K               21.20 seconds
56K                 12.80 seconds
ISDN 128K        4.06 seconds
T1 1.44Mbps     0.53 seconds

This website is proudly hosted on Crocweb Cloud Website Hosting.