Alternative Article Editor

[feline]

All the lang files use utf8 charset.
For other codepages you have to translate these files.

Fel

[feline]

Now .. I have tested the editor and found many great bugs.

• The editarea have no scrolling, it takes longer and longer on add textlines - very bad
• On press enter, the cursor is not moved down to next line - bad
• The corsor move out of texterea at the end - bad
• Click indent on marked text and then unindent, the textarea is complete destroy - absulutly bad
• if the editerea not selected, the buttons work, on html edit, the popup is empty - absolutly bad
• the dom output is not formatted, so html edit is strong - very bad
• No cleanup button, to remove any formatting - bad
• lot of more smaller bugs .. 

On this short test result I can say .. No, no, no .. to bad.

Fel

[bloc]

That def. isn't good lol

Thanks, Fel, for a detailed check. I actually did notice one or two of these points myself, and have tried a bit today. Its really lightweight, but its not any better than whizzwig without the image browser IMHO.

[KapaBG]

felina, it is not a full wisywig replacement. and not a repacment of other editors. it is tool for editing on the fly, no more. have many bugs, but don't try to make a changings! because ... author will soon release a version 0.3 with new features and plugins.  else less 30kb

[feline]

I think, for a editing on the fly, it's better to add the wysiwyg editor which smf2 have inside or use simple textarea. That's allways better then a buggy tool, that comes as "wysiwyg editor".

Fel

[bloc]

I agreed. Thats why now TP 1.0 has BBC articles..and I find myself using them more than HTML articles actually. But both are needed of course.

[KapaBG]

felina, ok. understand your position and respect. but i using necEdit in articles and happy

now TP 1.0 has BBC articles.

very right. it is good news for me. and good way - user must have right to choose favorite editor. through tpmodules or plugins

[feline]

Grand Duke, offcourse you can use the niceEdit for you, but as Bloc say ..
For ALL the users, they work with TinyPortal, it's better a perfect editor is inside.
Better for the user, better for support 

Fel

[KapaBG]

feline, you right, nicEdit is very short, speed, nice and cool micro wysiwig editor  :up: of the world 
aliluya! 

[dkillers]

Now .. I have tested the editor and found many great bugs.

• The editarea have no scrolling, it takes longer and longer on add textlines - very bad
• On press enter, the cursor is not moved down to next line - bad
• The corsor move out of texterea at the end - bad
• Click indent on marked text and then unindent, the textarea is complete destroy - absulutly bad
• if the editerea not selected, the buttons work, on html edit, the popup is empty - absolutly bad
• the dom output is not formatted, so html edit is strong - very bad
• No cleanup button, to remove any formatting - bad
• lot of more smaller bugs .. 

On this short test result I can say .. No, no, no .. to bad.

Fel

one more,
cannot make select all to the text