Print Page - SMF vs. Coppermine

Title: SMF vs. Coppermine
Post by: bas123 on April 14, 2008, 11:30:23 PM

Obviously, the SMF Gallery integrates simply, and I assume springing the $50 for Pro might be worthwhile but not ideal.

I've read a few of the threads here and at SMF, and wonder what others think.

I think the site I'm developing could really benefit from a "kick-ass" User participation Photo Gallery.

Your Thoughts?

Title: Re: SMF vs. Coppermine
Post by: Zetan on April 14, 2008, 11:42:26 PM

Moved to Chit Chat as the Installation board is for TP Installation support.

Title: Re: SMF vs. Coppermine
Post by: Ken. on April 15, 2008, 12:30:06 AM

I struggled with trying to make Gallery2 and Coppermine work smoothly with SMF/TP for a long and resisted SMFGallery Pro because of the cost. But because of my dissatisfaction with G2 and cpg I finally went with the pro version of SMFGallery and have been well pleased with the result.

Title: Re: SMF vs. Coppermine
Post by: bas123 on April 15, 2008, 12:34:19 AM

Well, if YOU struggled.... Can you imagine Mr. I'm getting a "Fatal Error" trying it? :2funny:

Title: Re: SMF vs. Coppermine
Post by: Lord Anubis on April 15, 2008, 01:13:05 AM

LOL bas123

and I actually like SMF Gallery Pro, not the free edition though...

There are plenty of configurable options and Thurnok has coded some nice blocks to use with SMF Gallery

Coppermine is kinda a pain, especially trying to make the skin resemble your forum

TinyPortal

General => Chit chat => Topic started by: bas123 on April 14, 2008, 11:30:23 PM