Login  |  Register
HTML5 Icon HTML5 Icon HTML5 Icon
TP on Social Media

Recent

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

November 26, 2022, 07:29:44 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Members
  • Total Members: 3853
  • Latest: tty456
Stats
  • Total Posts: 193612
  • Total Topics: 21103
  • Online today: 74
  • Online ever: 3540
  • (September 02, 2022, 06:38:54 PM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 48
Total: 48

Author Topic: Disable simley in Article  (Read 5578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

NightOwl

  • Guest
Disable simley in Article
« on: February 26, 2005, 01:19:50 PM »
Is there any way that I can disable simley in article?

And, there seems be something odd when I edit a long article. It will create extra blank spacing which makes the article longer, and need to scroll 4-5 page to see the article.

You can do an experiment like this

Just paste an ordinary html page with tables tag into the newly create article, then try to edit it and you see what I mean.
« Last Edit: February 26, 2005, 01:55:04 PM by NightOwl »

Bjørn

  • Guest
Re: Disable simley in Article
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2005, 02:21:59 PM »
Smileys: Not currently, but I will make it a option.

Editor: I will test it out. If it acts veird I might exhange AplosRTE with another...

NightOwl

  • Guest
Re: Disable simley in Article
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2005, 01:32:13 AM »
Excuse me for my first post, I think the real problem is cause by in-compatable of IE.

It's been quite a lot of work to import info pages from pure html into articles. When the smiley mess up some html codes when they are parsed.

Also, the odd behaviours of some tags, like <p> and <tables> are unexpectly occurs in IE viewing. Now I can't tell if they will happens in other browsers as well.

Firefox view:


IE view:


Please noted that both doesn't have Author's recorded.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2005, 02:08:26 AM by NightOwl »

Bjørn

  • Guest
Re: Disable simley in Article
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2005, 04:31:05 AM »
Yes, the author bug I am aware of.